The reading and lecture both discuss the salvage logging for the forest. While the reading states three advantages for salvage logging, the professor refutes, saying none of these claims are convincing.
Firstly, the reading states that the decomposition of dead trees takes many years. So, it is much better to go for salvage logging to give a good chance for new tree to grow for speed recovery for the forest areas. However, the professor refutes this point by saying that rapid cleaning for the forest is not the right solution for the tree's growth. This is because the deed trees can provide the soil by important nutrients. As a result, the rapid removal of the deed trees will remove the useful nutrients from the soil.
In addition, the article avers that the deed trees are a good environment for insects to spreed like bark bettle. Besides, they have a negative effect on the healthy trees. On the other hand, the speaker questions this notion by pointing out that there were many bettle at that area for hundreds years and they could not cause any damage. Furthermore, she states that these bettles were important for birds that are important to contribute for healthy forest.
Finally, the reading mentions that the salvage logging provides the industrial with wood and increases the job opportunities for many people. So, it has good economic effects. Nevertheless, the professor contradicts this idea by explaining that we need helicopter for salvage logging and that is very expensive process. In addition, the salvage logging provides the city with temporary jobs. This is because salvage logging needs works with a good experience and highly trained more than the local citizens. Consequently, the logging salvage does not have economic benefits.
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-09 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-27 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and ex 70
- TPO-31- Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the pastUse specific reasons and examples to s 70
- TPO-44 - Independent Writing Task Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing th 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'trees'' or 'tree's'?
Suggestion: trees'; tree's
...orest is not the right solution for the trees growth. This is because the deed trees ...
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...ssor contradicts this idea by explaining that we need helicopter for salvage log...
Line 7, column 246, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...ontradicts this idea by explaining that we need helicopter for salvage logging a...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, nevertheless, so, while, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12068965517 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50480869277 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537931034483 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6102508472 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3529411765 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0588235294 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41176470588 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.442411900887 0.272083759551 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144634365239 0.0996497079465 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640574346302 0.0662205650399 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259029863828 0.162205337803 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623619836089 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.