In this set of the materials, the author of the reading passage expresses that three theories of preventing the spread of the cane toad, which was introduced from Central and South America, in Australia. However, the professor thinks that the author's methods contain some defects.
First of all, the author states that building the fence that blocks the toads to move in the parts that have not yet colonized. And this method was successful for preventing the rabbits impacted the native ecosystems before. On the contrary, the professor indicates that the fence won't stop the young toads and the eggs to cross the fences. Because the young toads and eggs will flow by the stream and river, the fence doesn't solve the problem at all.
In addition, the author claims that the government should organize a campaign to capture and destroy the cane toads. Since the cane toads and their eggs are easily captured and destroyed. However, the professor refutes the author's idea by saying that people who will capture the toads are untrained. The volunteers probably would destroy the native frogs who are endangered due to the volunteers lack of knowledge of the cane toads.
Finally, the author raises the point that researchers can invent the designed virus to control the population of the cane toads. On the other hand, the professor discusses that the cane toads will transfer to the United Stated for researching. It probably will carry the virus to the United States, and cause the ecological system damaged. Because the cane toads are parts of the United Stated ecosystem originally, the virus will damage the server problem to the ecosystem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 420, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...flow by the stream and river, the fence doesnt solve the problem at all. In additio...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...yed. However, the professor refutes the authors idea by saying that people who will cap...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, so, in addition, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03284671533 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40055282052 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492700729927 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.5150514885 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.447204612691 0.272083759551 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153603895391 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071486101648 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26250634098 0.162205337803 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249649717813 0.0443174109184 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.