Based on the given materials, the article as well as the lecture discuss cane toads, which are an around two kilograms amphibian species live in Central and South America with high birthing rates, and have been used in Australia for making the farms' crops safer. Nowadays, they're counted as a threaten for other small native animals. The author states that there are several viable ways to get secure from distribution of these animals.
Initially, the author mentions an experience from using international fences for being safe from rabbits' distribution in the early of the twentieth century, and says that by constructing a national fence, this unsecured condition would be handled easily. However, the lecturer explains that young cane toads are living near rivers and streams, and the water flow between two distinct places cannot be controlled, this strategy will be failed owing to the fact that just a few of can toads are enough to distribute the population.
Second, the writer proclaims a governmental strategy in which some volunteers capture or omit the toads by trapping or catching them by hand. In addition, as the young toads and cane eggs are limited to the rivers, they should've captured easily. Yet again, the speaker underscores that untrained volunteers might have some mistakes in finding out the differences between Australian native frogs and young cane toads while they're trying to trap them, owing to the fact that there are several similarities between those mentioned species.
The final point of contention between the reading and listening passage is a virus for a predicted disease-virus. The author thinks that the maturing and reproducing properties of cane toads can be handled by this type of virus, which is able to have some effects on number of reptiles. On the other hand, the speaker explains that some Australian reptiles and amphibians will be transported to Central and South America for lots of purposes like research, and if they were infected, they will have a lot of disadvantages for original habitat of cane toads, which count as an essential part of US ecosystem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...making the farms crops safer. Nowadays, theyre counted as a threaten for other small n...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rops safer. Nowadays, theyre counted as a threaten for other small native animals. The aut...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: should've
...ne eggs are limited to the rivers, they shouldve captured easily. Yet again, the speaker...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 423, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...native frogs and young cane toads while theyre trying to trap them, owing to the fact ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, well, while, in addition, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1774.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 346.0 270.72406181 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12716763006 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67630057803 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557803468208 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 86.124645401 49.2860985944 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.272727273 110.228320801 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4545454545 21.698381199 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72727272727 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.398646087004 0.272083759551 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141185746512 0.0996497079465 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744829527144 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229924281817 0.162205337803 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619029921276 0.0443174109184 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.5 13.3589403974 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 53.8541721854 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.0289183223 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.42419426049 113% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 63.6247240618 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.