TPO 16 -
In the reading passage, the author claims that the field of archeology encounters sever obstacles and restrictions in Britain, which contains a wide array of precious traces of human settlements living in the past, by pointing out 3 reasons of support. However, finding all the ideas implausible and questionable, the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text. She refers to the rule established in 1990 in the United Kingdom that altered all the difficulties mentioned in reading and did enhance substantial improvement in all those three areas.
At first, the author argues that worthy artifacts are being destroyed due to construction projects. Conversely, the professor demonstrates that based on the 1990's regulation, before any construction begun, the site should be scrutinized by expert archeologists which had not done previously. Besides, with the cooperation of government and constructor, all the artifacts have been excavated properly and preserved in scientific manner.
In addition, the reading passage holds the view that owing to lack of financial support, remarkable amount of interesting sites left without any excavation. On the other hand, the lecturer disputes this point by clarifying the fact that according to the rule, any operation which undertake with the aim of initial examination of the constructions' sites should be financially supported by the constructor. Therefore, having earned more fund in addition to the governmental supports, archeologists are able to do far more researches in comparison to the past.
Finally, the author asserts that so restrained is the job opportunities for archeologists that they have been compelled to go for the jobs in other fields. The professor, though, dismisses this idea by subscribing to the point that nowadays the number of paid archeologists has increased significantly. As a matter of fact, having engaged in various steps of construction sites including the examining, preserving, doing the research and data analyzing, the archeologists can find the job in a variety fields which are not available in the past.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, conversely, finally, first, however, if, so, therefore, in addition, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 30.3222958057 175% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1373.03311258 130% => OK
No of words: 326.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46625766871 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20198971789 2.5805825403 124% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 145.348785872 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598159509202 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.2199820268 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.5 110.228320801 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 21.698381199 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06452816374 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153710023292 0.272083759551 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540727692705 0.0996497079465 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323402500039 0.0662205650399 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0906612235404 0.162205337803 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229697461089 0.0443174109184 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.3589403974 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.42419426049 119% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 63.6247240618 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.