It is written in the passage that archeologists in Britain were encountered with many obstacles during the twentieth century. According to the lecture, with the publication of the new guideline in 1999, archeology field have improved opportunities than before.
First off, as a response to the claim of the reading that construction facilities destroyed the archaeologically precious artifacts and sites, the lecture states that it is a rule that builders have to allow archeologist to examine the site before construction facilities. This facilitates preserving archeological coverings so; precious artifacts and valuable sites will be preserved and documented.
Moreover, the lecture points out that construction companies are responsible for meeting the costs of archeological work process so; the government should not be supposed to invest money on that. Furthermore, companies have great opportunities to examine archeological sites.
Lastly, the author of the reading complains about low job opportunities for people who are interested in archeology. So, this causes people to work on other fields and make contributions to archeology as an amateur. The lecturer, by contrast, claims that there are a lot of well-paid works and the archeology field hires many people to complete projects. So; charming paid also increases job opportunities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 201.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76119402985 5.08290768461 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34788536651 2.5805825403 130% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621890547264 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6877329601 49.2860985944 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.8 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191209526185 0.272083759551 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713121882508 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475585655514 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111965223797 0.162205337803 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336771930069 0.0443174109184 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.8541721854 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.0289183223 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.2367328918 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.7273730684 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.