The reading passages states three reasons that the difficulty of archaeology research faced in United Kingdom. However the lecturer argues about the statement and offers a new rule to support herself.
First, the writer of the reading claims that many important artifacts were destoryed when building the new villages. However, the professor in the listening part disagrees with him. She says that the new guideline improves the process. When a local construction proceeds, the workers have to plan and preserve the place before acavating.
Second, the reading passages indicates the financial problem while researching archaeology. On the other hand, the lecturer says that now construction company should pay for the research which is a new source of money. In addition, the money offered by the company can also be used for developing the science of archaeology and preseving the ancient buildings.
Last but not the least, the construction company hires the processors and scholars to do the research and offers them opportunities to process data and write paper.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ology research faced in United Kingdom. However the lecturer argues about the statement...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 22.412803532 36% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 1373.03311258 66% => OK
No of words: 168.0 270.72406181 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.375 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 4.04702891845 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78138017543 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 145.348785872 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636904761905 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 419.366225166 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.960131414 49.2860985944 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219317445554 0.272083759551 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762024938141 0.0996497079465 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427971672342 0.0662205650399 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112754006667 0.162205337803 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541775984658 0.0443174109184 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.