The rading passage is discussing about archeology and how archeologist thinks that it is diminished and the listening passage, cast doubt on this idea but in contrast listening passage said it is growing.
First, the reading passage states that based on the growing of population,we needed more construction and new building were built without asking any opinion of archeologist and the artifacts ruined. But the listenning passage said the opposite and it said the buiders have to excavate before they are allowed to proceed.
Second, the reading passage states that financial support for archeoologist is not enough but in contrast listening said that nowadays the company is paying the archeologist instead of goverment.
Third, the reading passage states that there is lack of jobs in archeology. On the other hand the listening passage states that there is paid work to examine before the buildings are built and they are a lot of research and report to be done by archeologists
Essay evaluation report
The rading passage is discussing about archeology and how archeologist thinks that it is diminished and the listening passage, cast doubt on this idea but in contrast listening passage said it is growing.
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
Sentence: The rading passage is discussing about archeology and how archeologist thinks that it is diminished and the listening passage, cast doubt on this idea but in contrast listening passage said it is growing.
Error: rading Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: But the listenning passage said the opposite and it said the buiders have to excavate before they are allowed to proceed.
Error: listenning Suggestion: listening
Error: buiders Suggestion: builders
Sentence: Second, the reading passage states that financial support for archeoologist is not enough but in contrast listening said that nowadays the company is paying the archeologist instead of goverment.
Error: goverment Suggestion: government
Error: archeoologist Suggestion: archeologist
flaws:
No. of Words: 161 250 //more arguments wanted from lecture side
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 18 in 30
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 5 2
No. of Sentences: 6 12
No. of Words: 161 250
No. of Characters: 811 1200
No. of Different Words: 89 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.562 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.037 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.725 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 64 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 49 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 27 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 26.833 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.493 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 1 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.519 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.82 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.166 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is diminished and the listening passage, cast doubt on this idea but in contrast ...
^^
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , we
... that based on the growing of population,we needed more construction and new buildi...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'second', 'third', 'in contrast', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.280701754386 0.261695866417 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.222222222222 0.158904122519 140% => OK
Adjectives: 0.046783625731 0.0723426182421 65% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0175438596491 0.0435111971325 40% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0350877192982 0.0277247811725 127% => OK
Prepositions: 0.12865497076 0.128828473217 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0701754385965 0.0370669169778 189% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.81318741599 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0233918128655 0.0208969081088 112% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.105263157895 0.128158765124 82% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.0158828679856 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0116959064327 0.0114777025283 102% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 990.0 1645.83664459 60% => OK
No of words: 160.0 271.125827815 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.1875 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 4.04852973271 88% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.4125 0.374372842146 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.31875 0.287516216867 111% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.1875 0.187439937562 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.125 0.113142543107 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81318741599 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 145.348785872 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.539623497131 102% => OK
Word variations: 45.5748003015 53.8517498576 85% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0529801325 46% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 26.6666666667 21.7502111507 123% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0994340461 49.3711431718 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.0 132.220823453 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 21.7502111507 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.16666666667 0.878197800319 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 58.5416666667 50.5018328374 116% => OK
Elegance: 1.74468085106 1.90840788429 91% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.463338965015 0.549887131256 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.204392829795 0.142949733639 143% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0567078365801 0.0787303798458 72% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.825483920353 0.631733273073 131% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.151403885028 0.139662658121 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.302747205809 0.266732575781 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833652562594 0.103435571967 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.343938603346 0.414875509568 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0195761728947 0.0530846634433 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.337928040992 0.40443939384 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119723002163 0.0528353158467 227% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 10.2958057395 58% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.