According to the reading passage, increases human population and related growth of agriculture and uses of pesticide caused decline birds population in the United States. Whereas, the lecturer states that human population, agricultural and pesticide harm only few birds species and provides the reasons in article is unconvincing. He contradicts to certain points made in the reading passage.
To begin with, the lecturer opposes the first reason made in the reading passage that the forests, grasslands, and wetlands replace homes, mall and offices causes less space for birds as result, decline bird population. He mentions that human settle perilous for few bird species but provides better and larger habitat for other bird species. In fact, people complaints about increase populations of certain birds. For an example, passenger pigeon, rodents, hawk and many other birds surging the population. For some birds decline but over all other species population are increases.
Furthermore, the lecturer also refutes the second point made in the article that wilderness area uses for agricultural activities. He explains that it is true that growth of agriculture but in United State less land used for agriculture. Continue introduction of more variety crop but not uses the extra land, therefore uses of wilderness area for agriculture is not essential.
Moreover, the reading passage claims that uses of pesticide harm to birds because of pesticide infect the insect which are eat by birds and also pesticide contaminated water drink by birds. In contrast, the lecturer emphasizes that people now aware about pesticide uses and change in pesticide manufacturing. First, new pesticide is less toxic compare to past. Second, growing the pest resistant crops are not harm for birds.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 124, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'eaten'.
Suggestion: eaten
...f pesticide infect the insect which are eat by birds and also pesticide contaminate...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, moreover, second, so, therefore, whereas, in contrast, in fact, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45848375451 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75069879951 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519855595668 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.8254942514 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.8 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4666666667 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45352525035 0.272083759551 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155343621834 0.0996497079465 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887326099593 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275233076146 0.162205337803 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386179817283 0.0443174109184 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.