TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for b

The article states that with growing of humans population and increasing of agriculture and pesticide in united state make harmful position for animals especialy the birds.However, the professor explains none of the author's reasons are convincing and refutes them one by one.

To begin with, by increasing the humans population, birds habitats become less and less.As the reading claims, is refuted by professor.He assert that the reading mention is not completely true because increasing human population may increase the population of some birds, while decreasing others for example, by increasing the human's settlements birds benefit from bigger habitats.

In addition, according to essay, by increasing agricultral activities, birds habitatswill become destroyed.Nevertheless, the professor argues that increasing the human's may not cause the agricultral field to become more, instead human may grow some plant that have more harvast in order to increase food for people.

Finally, based on author's opinion some of chemical presticide may harm birds and kill them.On the contrary, the professor shows that people can protect their plants by some pest resistive product instead of using chemical materials.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...osition for animals especialy the birds.However, the professor explains none of the aut...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ne. To begin with, by increasing the humans population, birds habitats become less ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 89, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...on, birds habitats become less and less.As the reading claims, is refuted by profe...
^^
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: He
...reading claims, is refuted by professor.He assert that the reading mention is not ...
^^
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'He' must be used with a third-person verb: 'asserts'.
Suggestion: asserts
...ding claims, is refuted by professor.He assert that the reading mention is not complet...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ricultral activities, birds habitatswill become destroyed.Nevertheless, the profe...
^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Nevertheless
...s, birds habitatswill become destroyed.Nevertheless, the professor argues that increasing ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
....Nevertheless, the professor argues that increasing the humans may not cause the ...
^^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...presticide may harm birds and kill them.On the contrary, the professor shows that ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, may, nevertheless, so, while, for example, in addition, on the contrary, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 180.0 270.72406181 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77222222222 5.08290768461 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05449981761 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 13.0662251656 31% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 45.0 21.2450331126 212% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.9835202583 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 259.75 110.228320801 236% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 45.0 21.698381199 207% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 26.0 7.06452816374 368% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274426532993 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159346425617 0.0996497079465 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469893995494 0.0662205650399 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159346425617 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469893995494 0.0443174109184 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 28.2 13.3589403974 211% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 8.88 53.8541721854 16% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 5.55761589404 234% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 23.2 11.0289183223 210% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 17.07 12.2367328918 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.42419426049 129% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.5 10.7273730684 275% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 20.0 10.498013245 191% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.