TPO 18 Integrated
The professor explains three arguments opposing the points presented in the reading passage about the three solutions of maintaining Toreeya from extinction.
First, the professor argues that reestablishing Torreya in the same location is unlikely to sucess due to the fact that their microclimate are affected by climate changes of larger ecosystem which is caused by global warming. Also, wetlands are draining, consequently, cool microclimate is hardly to achieve anymore. Although, the reading passage states that Florida's microclimate is can be suitable to Torreya because it is wetter and has lower temperature, the professor repudiates mentioned explanations by presenting convincing evidences.
Second, the reading passage states that Torreya can be transform to a completely new location that is cooler, wetter and suitable. On the contrary, the professor draws attention to the previous experience of another plant species, Black Locas Tree, which developed rapidly in the new environment and killed off many of other native plants. As she claims, the consequences of plants' migration to a new place is unpredictable. Thus, she rejects this suggestion too.
Third and last, the reading passage asserts that Torreya can be preserve in research centers. This option has twofold. Scientists are easily able to protect and perform some research on it. In contrast, the professor disproves the idea due to the fact that Torreya could not resist against diseases in laboratory environment for the long term. Therefore, this idea has been reject by the professor either.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, second, so, therefore, third, thus, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57676348548 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93509737099 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593360995851 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 66.3311577255 49.2860985944 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.384615385 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2868680722 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952200694473 0.0996497079465 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.075285649087 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156055501695 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838163945884 0.0443174109184 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.2367328918 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 10.7273730684 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.