TPO 33
The professor explains three clear arguments opposing the points stated in the reading passage about the purposes and meanings of carved stone balls.
First, the author of the passage states that carved stone balls might used as weapons or tools for hunting and fighting due to holes and grooves which were found in them, enable people to connect stone balls with a cord and throw it toward victim. Conversely, the lecturer bring up the idea that many tools that were used as weapon, for instance arrowheads, had sign in them, indicate their purpose. In addition, stone balls should be cracked or broken in the fights, but most of stone balls' surface are in a good form.
Second, it is mentioned in the reading that carved stone balls were used as benchmarks in order to measure weights. On the contrary, the professor argues this claim, and stated that carved stone balls were made from different materials which means similar carved stone ball's weight were not similar to each other. Therefore, they couldn't be used as standard measures for weighting foods or other stuffs.
Third and last, the reading passage asserts that carved stone balls used as jewelry to show owner's social status because artisan made them elaborately. In contrast, the professor disproves this idea two to the fact that some of carved stone balls had intrigued patterns while other benefits from simple designs. In addition, people used to put dead peoples' belongings into grave but archaeologists didn't find any carved stone balls in graves. Therefore, the professor repudiates this hypothesis too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the stone') or simply say ''most stone''.
Suggestion: most of the stone; most stone
...be cracked or broken in the fights, but most of stone balls surface are in a good form. S...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
... similar to each other. Therefore, they couldnt be used as standard measures for weight...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 399, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...elongings into grave but archaeologists didnt find any carved stone balls in graves. ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, second, so, therefore, third, while, for instance, in addition, in contrast, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10769230769 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32977892138 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561538461538 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7637244932 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.727272727 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 21.698381199 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9090909091 7.06452816374 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.49753353942 0.272083759551 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200151434696 0.0996497079465 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951025195307 0.0662205650399 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305647532593 0.162205337803 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105527681423 0.0443174109184 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.