The reading and the lecture are both about The Torreya tree, Which will soon become extinct. The author of the reading believes that this three ways could help the Torreya from declining. The lecturer casts doubt on the author claims made in the article. She thinks that this three ways are not satisfactory to save the Torreya.
First of all, The author of the reading claims that reestablish Torreya in the same location that are convenient for this tree. He believes that it will helps the tree to grow in the microclimate and this climate is wetter and cooler than the surrounding region. This point is challenged by the lecture. She points out that in case of global warming this microclimate is drying day by day. Furthermore she points out that once the florida climate was wetland that is now dry so thats not work.
Secondly, The author states that assistant migration will help to save this Torreya. He argues that when the tree relocate far and different location that this seed have been more successfully planted and grow. This argument is rebutted by the lecturer. She suggests that this far and different relocate can kill the other species plants. She eleborates this idea that when the tree can move another place this place may be occure other plants extinction.
Finally, The author says that preserve in the research center to save the torreya could be useful and this monitoring. The lecturer, on the other hand, feels that research center have not enough space or capabilitry to preserve.And also claims that severals disease can not resist by the research center.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and the lecture are both about The Torreya tree, Which w...
^^
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... could help the Torreya from declining. The lecturer casts doubt on the author clai...
^^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...for this tree. He believes that it will helps the tree to grow in the microclimate an...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...this microclimate is drying day by day. Furthermore she points out that once the florida cl...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
... climate was wetland that is now dry so thats not work. Secondly, The author state...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 229, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: And
...enough space or capabilitry to preserve.And also claims that severals disease can n...
^^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'severals'' or 'several's'?
Suggestion: severals'; several's
...ilitry to preserve.And also claims that severals disease can not resist by the research ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91111111111 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40308443772 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511111111111 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 388.8 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2977845445 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.875 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.875 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326009926011 0.272083759551 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114823250923 0.0996497079465 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735178396294 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199716520847 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346173048578 0.0443174109184 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.