The reading and lecture both discuss the possible solutions to protect the Torreya Taxifoha from extinction. While the reading provides three ideas to save the Torreya, the professor refutes, saying none of these claims are convincing.
Firstly, the reading avers that we can reestablish the Torreya at the cooling microclimate areas at florida to protect them from any extinction. On the other hand, the professor argues this notion by saying that it is unlikely to be successful. This is because the cooler microclimate arears are affected by global temperature. In addition, the global warming will increase the temperature and Florida does not have too much rain. So, the microclimate will became dryer. As a result, the Torreya can not survive ate Florida microclimate.
Secondly, the article mentions that we can apply the assisted migration program to Torreya and move them to new area at the north. However, the professor rejects this point by saying that when human moved the black local tree to new environment, these trees killed other plants and trees in that area. So, many trees and plants extincted at the new habitat. Consequently, the assisted migration has negative outcome for the new environment.
Lastly, the reading states that we can save the Torreya at the research centers in order to keep them save, and the researchers can do plenty of experiments. Nevertheless, the professor contradicts this point by explaining that the Torreya population can not resist the diseases at the research centers. Furthermore, they have to be in large population and genetic diverse in order to survive at that place. However, the research centers do not have enough capacity to get the Torreya diversity. As a result, the reseach centers can not save Torreya on the long term.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'become'
Suggestion: become
...oo much rain. So, the microclimate will became dryer. As a result, the Torreya can not...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, as to, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 291.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16838487973 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76595374368 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501718213058 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0292076825 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4705882353 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1176470588 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23529411765 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342463301188 0.272083759551 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11540476787 0.0996497079465 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633424396892 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205624798533 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569533824436 0.0443174109184 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.