The article discusses mehods to save the Torreya from being extinct and suggests three ways to do it. However, the professor explains that they are inefficiant and rejects each of the methods provided by the author.
First, the reading posits that it can be helpful to reestablish Torreya in the same location in which it thrived before. The professor refutes this point by saying that changes in the earth like global warming, has changed the quality of lands in those areas and it is now drier and has less potential for good growth of these plants.
Second, the article claims that another way to save Torreya is to move them to new places, however the professor contends that this might cause problems to other spices and plants. She illustrates this by giving an example of a black locks tree. She states that humans had moved them to a different location, and as a result, other plants had been badly damaged which acctully was in the dangure of beeing extinct. So this shows that this method can change the ecosystem and put other spices in danger.
Third, the reading avers that another option is to preserve Torreya in research centers. The professor opposes this method by saying that only a small number of population of Torreya can be kept in the research centers because of their low capacity which is not good. According to the professor, it is necceserry to have large amount of geneticly diverse plants to ensure their servivel.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...opposes this method by saying that only a small number of population of Torreya can be kept in th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.222222222222 0.261695866417 85% => OK
Verbs: 0.185185185185 0.158904122519 117% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0851851851852 0.0723426182421 118% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0333333333333 0.0435111971325 77% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0444444444444 0.0277247811725 160% => OK
Prepositions: 0.125925925926 0.128828473217 98% => OK
Participles: 0.0444444444444 0.0370669169778 120% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.33969570671 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0444444444444 0.0208969081088 213% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.125925925926 0.128158765124 98% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0148148148148 0.0158828679856 93% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0148148148148 0.0114777025283 129% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1450.0 1645.83664459 88% => OK
No of words: 250.0 271.125827815 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8 6.08160592843 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04852973271 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.372 0.374372842146 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.276 0.287516216867 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.132 0.187439937562 70% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.072 0.113142543107 64% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33969570671 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584 0.539623497131 108% => OK
Word variations: 59.3997310371 53.8517498576 110% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 22.7272727273 21.7502111507 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1833729383 49.3711431718 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.818181818 132.220823453 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 21.7502111507 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.636363636364 0.878197800319 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 50.3272727273 50.5018328374 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.49295774648 1.90840788429 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.670428574868 0.549887131256 122% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.108235807344 0.142949733639 76% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0516645261261 0.0787303798458 66% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.622672609405 0.631733273073 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.139405045822 0.139662658121 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.318645956262 0.266732575781 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113210188124 0.103435571967 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.360987597905 0.414875509568 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0136531406226 0.0530846634433 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.490080000672 0.40443939384 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619519728318 0.0528353158467 117% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 10.2958057395 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.