The article states that changing the number of working days from 5 to 4 is benifitial and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that the reasons provided by the author are not acurate and the results will not be the same as it was described in the text and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading posits that with this change the companies will profit more and reduce unemployment rate. The professor refutes this point by saying that it will acutally be costly for them and provides some reasons for that. He states that, since with this change more employees will be requared, as a result companies will have to have more training programs. Also, the health care will be a problem and they will need more rooms and equipments for office.
Second, the article claims that this will make the work easier for the workers., owever, the professor contends that this change will actually raise the expectations from the empoyees because the companies will expect the same results as it was when the number of working days were 5 days per week, which will result in more stress and unpleasent feeling in employies and they would have to work harder to achieve that.
Third, the reading avers that this change will benifite empoyees by giving them more free time and increase their quality of life. The lecture opposes this by saying that actually this will put the job of the workers in risk because the will have less chance to advance in their work. Also, he states that the companies prefer the empoyees who have 5 days each week so this change will decrease the chance of promotion.
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.239344262295 0.261695866417 91% => OK
Verbs: 0.16393442623 0.158904122519 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0393442622951 0.0723426182421 54% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0393442622951 0.0435111971325 90% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0360655737705 0.0277247811725 130% => OK
Prepositions: 0.134426229508 0.128828473217 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0295081967213 0.0370669169778 80% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.21631645288 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Infinitives: 0.016393442623 0.0208969081088 78% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.150819672131 0.128158765124 118% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0524590163934 0.0158828679856 330% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00983606557377 0.0114777025283 86% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1633.0 1645.83664459 99% => OK
No of words: 284.0 271.125827815 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75 6.08160592843 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.04852973271 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.341549295775 0.374372842146 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.232394366197 0.287516216867 81% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.133802816901 0.187439937562 71% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0669014084507 0.113142543107 59% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21631645288 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471830985915 0.539623497131 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.2493536184 53.8517498576 84% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 28.4 21.7502111507 131% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.696432482 49.3711431718 182% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 163.3 132.220823453 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4 21.7502111507 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.9 0.878197800319 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 51.6394366197 50.5018328374 102% => OK
Elegance: 1.68493150685 1.90840788429 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.495883736921 0.549887131256 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.174452636325 0.142949733639 122% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0495648475657 0.0787303798458 63% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.716210134313 0.631733273073 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.133532834552 0.139662658121 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.261122882058 0.266732575781 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0865548009399 0.103435571967 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.483151374398 0.414875509568 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.112642629538 0.0530846634433 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.370755109382 0.40443939384 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053631647904 0.0528353158467 102% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.26048565121 47% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.