The author describes that there are three solutions to tackle declining Torreya taxifoha trees and brings up three reasons to support this claim. On the other hand, the professor explains that unfortunately none of these ways are promising and they cannot provide satisfactory solutions and refutes each of the author's points on rational grounds.
First of all, the writer states that the Torreya can be reestablished in the same location in which it thrived for many years. Nevertheless, the professor posits that the coolest and dampest microclimates strongly is susceptible of the effect of the larger regions. In fact, as the global warming, the temperature of the climate rises, and the wetlands drained, this region becomes drier. So, Torreya cannot survive in this area of the microclimate.
Second, according to reading, the Torreya can be moved to a completely different location, far away from its Florida microclimate. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that scientists helped another black locust tree before. They move this tree to the North. As a matter of fact, this tree spread successfully and quickly, but lead to the killing of other plants and trees. To be more specific, these endangered plants and trees are threatened to become extinct which means that making some changes may cause the unpredictable outcome.
Third, the author expresses that Torreya tree can be kept in the research centers to be preserved. However. the speaker points out that keeping Torreya in these centers are not a good solution. In fact, the population of trees kept in these centers cannot be able to resist the diseases. More precisely, provided that the population of these trees should be relatively large and genetically diverse, such as what we have seen in the wildlife, this plan will be successful, whereas, Torreya population has not enough capacity and preserving Torreya brings about the diseases problems in the long term.
Therefore, the points mentioned in the reading do not make any sense.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...s that unfortunately none of these ways are promising and they cannot provide satisfactory so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 99, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...n the research centers to be preserved. However. the speaker points out that keeping To...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...earch centers to be preserved. However. the speaker points out that keeping Torreya...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, whereas, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 326.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19325153374 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73565464115 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 145.348785872 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561349693252 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4528572205 49.2860985944 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.8125 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3125 7.06452816374 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.387778699708 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126880169848 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107289043987 0.0662205650399 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181837117802 0.162205337803 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117797978081 0.0443174109184 266% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.