tpo 19 integrated
The articles states that because consumers now ignore advertising companies, so advertising companies hire people known as buzzers to advertise their product. The reading provided the critics the banned buzzer from being extended. However the lecture opposes and refutes each of the articles claims.
First the articles argue that buzzers not telling the truth, because buzzer get paid for what they are going to say. Also the reading states that buzzers are misleading to the consumers. However, the professor opposes this point. He says that he usually telling the truth. He states that he really thinks that his phone’s company is great and that is why the company hired him as a buzzer to advertise their products.
Second, the article states that buzzer pretend to be separate individuals to relation to any companies and that they just like the product, consumers accept and approve to listen to them. But that is misleading to the consumer. Buzzer must tell the truth. But he professor opposes this point by consumers all the time ask many questions to the buzzers and the buzzers rule is to be knowledgeable and answer all the consumer questions.
Third the articles posit that buzzers result in mistrust and dishonest, because it has harmful relationship on the society. Yet, the professor disagrees. He pointed out those buzzers not destroy the civilization. For example, once the consumers got the good product and feel satisfied with his product, he got good experiences and become more trustful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'state'.
Suggestion: state
The articles states that because consumers now ignore adver...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 232, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... the banned buzzer from being extended. However the lecture opposes and refutes each of...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 118, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...et paid for what they are going to say. Also the reading states that buzzers are mis...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, really, second, so, third, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21544715447 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61641187088 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548780487805 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.8771388787 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1875 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.375 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0625 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259319964444 0.272083759551 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788391672674 0.0996497079465 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728468667626 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171455438079 0.162205337803 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587566024958 0.0443174109184 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.