Both the lecture and passage discuss about the advertizing company using buzzing instead of the commercial advertisement. According to the passage, advertising through the buzzer should ban because it is misleading to consumer. Whereas, according to the lecture, buzzer not deceive to any customer but the person satisfy with product and he gave the review about the product. The professor in the lecture refutes the each outline presents in the reading.
Firstly, the author claims that the person praise the product but actually product not really good as expected to the customer. Company paid for misleading to consumer. On the contrast, the man mentions that, he really happy with products therefore, he was work with company. It is true that company paid to him for advertisement but he was not misleading to any customers.
Secondly, the passage implies that buzzers persuaded to consumer to buy product by advertising. However, the speaker explains that he not convincing but customer asked about the product prizes, service and how long has been use it; he just gave the information about the products.
Lastly, the reading emphasizes that damage the civilization as consequently, spread the dishonesty. In contrast, a men points out that company service is good, therefore consumer put their trust on company.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: MAN_MEN[1]
Message: 'man' is the singular form of 'men'. Consider using 'man'?
Suggestion: man
..., spread the dishonesty. In contrast, a men points out that company service is good...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, lastly, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, in contrast, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 210.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30952380952 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81114158427 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8283042239 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9166666667 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06452816374 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21071184724 0.272083759551 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771244121578 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425202898731 0.0662205650399 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117894469168 0.162205337803 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427621979939 0.0443174109184 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.