The reading and the lecture both about the commercial advertisement which is called buzzing whereas the author of the reading suggest that the advertisement in which the people use to promote the items without telling others that they are paid promoters. The lecture disagree on this. He says that the author of the reading have misleading information about the buzzing.The lecture cast doubts on the main point made in the reading by providing three reasons.
First of all, according to the reading the buzzing promotion gives the false information to the people as by hiding the fact that they are promoting the product and people tend to believe it. However, the lecture disputes this points. He says that the company for the buzzing policy finds the people who has uses the products. Furthermore, he mentions that the information which the buzzer give to people are true about the products.
Secondly, the reading states that buzzer who pretends that they are sharing the personal views about the product while promoting the product to people. These people tends to fall in the trap of the buzzer and cannot decide what is true and false as the buzzer are hiding behind the face. Nevertheless, the lecture refutes this argument. He argues that the people demand lots of answers about the products. For example, the cost of phones, its services. He adds more information by mentioning that if the buzzer himself had not used the product than he will be not able to answer those questions.
Finally, the reading claims that buzzing kills the social relationship between the people. It creates disloyalty among the people after they get to know that the people are promoting the products. On the other hand, the lecturer believe that this promotions would maintain the healthy relationship as the product is good. For an instance, the buzzer himself had used the product so the product would be definitely worth buying. Moreover, he feels that this policy of promotions would create a most trustful bonding between people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...t the advertisement in which the people use to promote the items without telling ot...
^^^
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'disagrees'.
Suggestion: disagrees
...at they are paid promoters. The lecture disagree on this. He says that the author of the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...isleading information about the buzzing.The lecture cast doubts on the main point m...
^^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'tend'.
Suggestion: tend
...ing the product to people. These people tends to fall in the trap of the buzzer and c...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e other hand, the lecturer believe that this promotions would maintain the healthy r...
^^^^
Line 7, column 532, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a most trustful bonding between people.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, for example, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 337.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04451038576 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49212232592 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46587537092 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 500.4 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.109818467 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4444444444 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7222222222 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308978052377 0.272083759551 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098209213308 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676649732109 0.0662205650399 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205611571676 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410962257959 0.0443174109184 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.