The main subject which is discussed is the advantages and disadvantages of group working. The readings looks into the merits of group working. adversely, the lecturer talks about the drawbacks.
Firstly, the passage asserts that the project conducted in a group is more efficient due to wide range of knowledge, experties, and skills that is involved as a result of group working. in contrast, the lecturer refute the passage by this reason that some people fail to work in a group and when the group work is evaluated it is not obvious that who has participated in the project and recognition is hard.
Besides, the readings claims that as the used resourses increase by group working, the project moves so quickly that it would not have been possible otherwise. Also, the solutions are more creative and the members can make more risky decisions because the responsibilities spread among group's members. However, the lecture cast doubt on this claim. It is highly likely that the members fail to approve a unite plan to do the project and the project did not move at all.
finally, due to the passage claim, group working not only can be rewarding for individuals who have a voice in good decisions, but also they have the chance to shine among group members if the group overall results be impressive. conversely, the lecture contradicts this idea because if 1 or 2 of the members influence the group decision, others who have disagreed the decision will be ignored by the others but if the project fails, the blame is for all the members.
The correct topics go here
The correct topics go here:
http://www.testbig.com/toefl
there are all TPO topics available including reading, writing, speaking and listening.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'look'.
Suggestion: look
...vantages of group working. The readings looks into the merits of group working. adver...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Adversely
...looks into the merits of group working. adversely, the lecturer talks about the drawbacks...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... involved as a result of group working. in contrast, the lecturer refute the passa...
^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...likely that the members fail to approve a unite plan to do the project and the pr...
^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...likely that the members fail to approve a unite plan to do the project and the project ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...and the project did not move at all. finally, due to the passage claim, group workin...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Conversely
...he group overall results be impressive. conversely, the lecture contradicts this idea bec...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive. conversely, the lecture contradicts this idea because if 1 or 2 of the membe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85660377358 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63686923978 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532075471698 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.1588516355 49.2860985944 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.