The main subject which is discussed is whether the group work can be much more efficient than individual work or not. The readings look into the merits of group working. adversely, the lecturer talks about the drawbacks.
Firstly, the passage asserts that the project conducted in a group is more efficient due to wide range of knowledge, experties, and skills that is involved as a result of group working. in contrast, the lecturer refute the passage by this reason that some people fail to work in a group and when the group work is evaluated it is not obvious that who has participated in the project and recognition is hard.
Besides, the readings claims that as the used resourses increase by group working, the project moves so quickly that it would not have been possible otherwise. Also, the solutions are more creative and the members can make more risky decisions because the responsibilities spread among group's members. However, the lecture cast doubt on this claim. It is highly likely that the members fail to approve a unite plan to do the project and the project did not move at all.
finally, due to the passage claim, group working not only can be rewarding for individuals who have a voice in good decisions, but also they have the chance to shine among group members if the group overall results be impressive. conversely, the lecture contradicts this idea because if 1 or 2 of the members influence the group decision, others who have disagreed the decision will be ignored by the others but if the project fails, the blame is for all the members.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'look'.
Suggestion: look
...an individual work or not. The readings looks into the merits of group working. adver...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Adversely
...looks into the merits of group working. adversely, the lecturer talks about the drawbacks...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... involved as a result of group working. in contrast, the lecturer refute the passa...
^^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...likely that the members fail to approve a unite plan to do the project and the pr...
^
Line 5, column 403, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...likely that the members fail to approve a unite plan to do the project and the project ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Finally
...and the project did not move at all. finally, due to the passage claim, group workin...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Conversely
...he group overall results be impressive. conversely, the lecture contradicts this idea beca...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, in contrast, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80882352941 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57172205443 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.6630291369 49.2860985944 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.909090909 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7272727273 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461271823309 0.272083759551 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166360402711 0.0996497079465 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113998000598 0.0662205650399 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280358985058 0.162205337803 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747423273197 0.0443174109184 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.