TPO 20
The lecture and the reading discuss the let it burn policy and forest fire in Yellowstone in 1988. Although the passage claims that let it burn policy had caused several damages in the Yellowstone, the speaker refutes this idea through several reasons which I will describe in this reporter.
First and foremost, the passage points out that the Yellowstone forest fire had been plentiful damages of trees and vegetable. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that new species planets were growing in the scorch, and scorched where colonize for new plants. She explains that plants and trees became more diversity after burning. Because small vegetable that lived in a shadow would have new opportunities for growth and receive sunlight. Also, some seeds need a high temperature for starting to grow, and the fire created opportunities for these planets.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that wildlife was affected harmfully form that fire, the professor argues that the fire had some benefits for wildlife as the same as vegetation life. She adds that the change in plants type makes an ideal habitat for smaller animals like rabbits and herds, subsequently, the population of these animals’ predators increases. Thus, a better and stronger food chain created in Yellowstone Park.
Finally, although the reading passage says that the attraction of the park was decreased so that the number of tourists decreased. The speaker disagrees by mentioning that the forest fire like Yellowstone fire happened unusual situation like low rainfall. And these situations did not happen every year. Also, we have have been not seeing the burning like the Yellow stone burn.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 314, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: have
...ons did not happen every year. Also, we have have been not seeing the burning like the Ye...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 319, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...id not happen every year. Also, we have have been not seeing the burning like the Ye...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, if, so, thus, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 270.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32222222222 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60154275217 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585185185185 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1372623115 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.642857143 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 7.06452816374 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389172060457 0.272083759551 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117635353773 0.0996497079465 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732716391412 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218774363502 0.162205337803 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176646084669 0.0443174109184 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.