TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task
The reading and lecture are both about a policy is named "let it burn". The article states that because of dangerous affect people wants to abolish this policy and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that actually, this is a good part of the ecological cycle. Even though, sometimes it accrues in large scales and refutes each of the author reasons.
First, the article mentions that Yellowstone fires caused damage to vegetation and at the end one-third of the land had been scorched. The professor counters this by saying this fire made space for smaller plants that need more area to grow and also for seeds that appear because of heat.
Second, the article claims that the park wildlife was affected as well, the bigger animals were fleeing the fire but the small ones couldn't scape so it caused the food chains destroyed. However, the lecturer contends that the fire recovered new opportunity for the other small animals like rabbits to spread and made the food chain for predators.
Moreover, it is stated in the article that the fire had negative consequences for the local economy because fewer tourists come to visit the park. In contrast, the professor believes there are a lot of reasons that caused fewer tourists such as low rain and humiliation. The tourists came back the next year and the years after.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ere fleeing the fire but the small ones couldnt scape so it caused the food chains dest...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, third, well, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1140.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97816593886 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37686997518 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598253275109 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0190926839 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.636363636 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353395693402 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112952560875 0.0996497079465 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826954331532 0.0662205650399 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19332490723 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626729252006 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.3589403974 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.