TPO-20 - Integrated Writing Task In the United States, it had been common practice since the late 1960s no to suppress natural forest fires. The “let it burn” policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly, without causing much dama
The reading claims that some critics disagree with "let it burn'' policy. The author elaborates his viewpoints by providing three main reasons. However, the professor believs that '' let it burn'' is greative, even it has some negative consequences and refutes each of the author's stand-points.
First, the reading avers from a significant damage on vegetaions and trees which is caused by fire and provides example of Yellowstone fire to illustrates that. Nevertheless, the professor refutes this concept by stating positive fire impacts on diversity of new plants. In addition, she states that fires could be create by improving remarkable opportunity for small plants to grow up and becoming widespread.
Furthermore, the reading posits that animals could died as a direct and indirect consequent of fires and mentioned food chains as an essential role in thriving the nature. On the other hand, the professor brings up the fact that a new opportunity will achieve by growing small plants. In fact, small animlas like, rabbit, and muse will increase after the fire, since more foods becom availible. also, she states that certain food chains will gain more power and strongness.
Finally, the article asserts tourist attraction could decrease by disapearing trees and jungle in fires. In contrary, the professor casts doubt on this cliam by stating that it will occur if fire burn happen every years. she implies that fires are rare in time; hence, the tourist attraction doesn't decrease. cause of the fire is massive for the people and not only visitor come in fire year, but also they will come each of years after burns too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ons. However, the professor believs that let it burn is greative, even it has som...
^^
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'significant damage'.
Suggestion: significant damage
...points. First, the reading avers from a significant damage on vegetaions and trees which is caused...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'die'
Suggestion: die
..., the reading posits that animals could died as a direct and indirect consequent of ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Also
...fire, since more foods becom availible. also, she states that certain food chains wi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 222, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
... occur if fire burn happen every years. she implies that fires are rare in time; he...
^^^
Line 7, column 293, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... in time; hence, the tourist attraction doesnt decrease. cause of the fire is massive ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Cause
...the tourist attraction doesnt decrease. cause of the fire is massive for the people a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, in addition, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1369.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14661654135 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60177537806 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609022556391 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7273228145 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7857142857 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245641918065 0.272083759551 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082824483047 0.0996497079465 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534090626207 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146353053296 0.162205337803 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436762246375 0.0443174109184 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.2367328918 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.