According to the passage, the opponents of the idea of “let it burn” wanted the substitution of this policy with a new policy, to extinguish forest fire as soon as possible, for three major destructive impacts they believe the current policy has on both forests and people. However, the lecturer believes that this policy is not always destructive, but also good in some situation.
First, according to the passage, the vegetation may adversely be influenced by fire. To support this idea, the author points out to the fire in Yellowstone, which caused one-third of the land to be scorched. On the other hand, the lecturer explains that vegetation in scorched land started to be more diverse than before since new trees and plants had the chance to grow in the absence of current trees. To support her claim, the author gives the example of the plants which were able to grow only in open unshaded land.
Second, the passage refers to the large animals’ flee and small animals’ death to explain that the idea of “let it burn” has negative impacts on animals living in forests. However, the lecturer explains that during the years after Yellowstone forest burning, animals’ population has been recovered.
Third, the fire in Yellowstone stopped a large number of tourists from visiting there, by shortening tourist season, which imposed negative impacts on the local economy. Nevertheless, according to the lecture, the phenomena such as fire in Yellowstone usually do not occur every year and this kinds of phenomena has not occurred in this place since 1988. Indeed, Yellowstone is able to attract tourists very soon and maintain local businesses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... Third, the fire in Yellowstone stopped a large number of tourists from visiting there, by shorte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 289, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...one usually do not occur every year and this kinds of phenomena has not occurred in ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ery soon and maintain local businesses.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, nevertheless, second, so, third, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20879120879 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76703985273 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549450549451 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 2.5761589404 311% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.589138344 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.272727273 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287341701471 0.272083759551 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100771100535 0.0996497079465 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543124556392 0.0662205650399 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156108222385 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328084039872 0.0443174109184 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.3589403974 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.