In the lecture, it says that fire is an natural event and it doesn't only for destruction but also for creation. In addition, creation is one of the reasons why the "let it burn" policy implemented. What the lecturer says clearly contradicts with what the author says in many term such as destruction.
First of all, the author believes that when we let the fire burn, it caused much more damage than imagined, so it seemed like fire has devastated the beautiful forest. Although, the lecturer says that many new plants and more small diverse plants were risen after 1988's big fire in the forest because fire destroyed plants those were preventing others not to grow.
Secondly, the author states that wild life got affected of the damage caused by fire in the Yellowstone fire. The availability of food was low, so the animals needed to leave the Yellowstone forest. On the other hand, after the fire, it created ideal habitat for small animals such as rabbits, the lecturer says. Furthermore, when it created habitat for small animals and made small animals come to Yellowstone forest, the bigger animals came back to the forest because the availability of food restored since small animals came back.
Thirdly, the author points out that Yellowstone was an attractive place for tourist and it was the source that brings tourists but the fire destroyed such place and it deteriorated the amount of people who used to visit there. However, the lecturer states that it was a problem of year. The forest got restored on the next year and such fire that happened to Yellowstone won't happen in years because other influences caused the fire. Moreover, visitors came back in the next year and in other years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
In the lecture, it says that fire is an natural event and it doesnt only for de...
^^
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ys that fire is an natural event and it doesnt only for destruction but also for creat...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun term seems to be countable; consider using: 'many terms'.
Suggestion: many terms
...ontradicts with what the author says in many term such as destruction. First of all, t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...estored since small animals came back. Thirdly, the author points out that Yell...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, in addition, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1435.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91438356164 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4767709526 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493150684932 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 443.7 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7823798162 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.384615385 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1538461538 7.06452816374 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357076744186 0.272083759551 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126829644995 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698071646799 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215506144265 0.162205337803 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644894049576 0.0443174109184 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.