According to the reading passage, ethanol replaced to gasoline is not good idea because of not getting the environmental benefits, decrease sources of food for animal and not compete with gasoline price. However, the lecturer refutes the three reasons made in the article and says that all reasons are unconvincing.
First, the reading passage claims that like gasoline,ethanol release carbon dioxide in atmosphere, therefore not getting environment benefits. The lecturer, in contrast, mentions that since ethanol obtain by corn, it is not harm to environment. It is true that ethanol release carbon dioxide in environment but plants absorb this gases, so in atmosphere carbon dioxide level not increase.
Second, the article emphasizes that ethanol produce from corns which are crucial food for farm animal. If, 60% corns used for manufacturing ethanol, then deplete sources of food for animals. The lecturer, on contrary, explains that ethanol produce by uses of part of plant is called as cellulose which is outer part of corn plant and it is not food for animals, therefore, using of plants part not decrease sources of food for animals
Third, the lecturer oppose the last point made by reading passage that in future, government not provide the tax subsidies to ethanol producers, then ethanol cannot compete with gasoline prices. He implies that without subsidies also ethanol will compete with gasoline cost because of increase the uses of ethanol, then, surging demand for production of ethanol. The producers are more produce ethanol, eventually ethanol prices will decrease.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 53, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , ethanol
...eading passage claims that like gasoline,ethanol release carbon dioxide in atmosphere, t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 72, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...last point made by reading passage that in future, government not provide the tax subsidi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, third, in contrast, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38554216867 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66275054783 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530120481928 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 100.630263837 49.2860985944 204% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 134.1 110.228320801 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9 21.698381199 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.497715003984 0.272083759551 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.221001481708 0.0996497079465 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100782123465 0.0662205650399 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292534374944 0.162205337803 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874408295179 0.0443174109184 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.