The reading passage claims that ethanol fuel is not a good alternative for gasoline because of some reasons. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas implausible and presents some evidence to refute them all
First, the reading holds the view that use of ethanol would result in global warming since ethanol releases carbon dioxide just like gasoline. On the contrary, the professor brings up the idea that although burning ethanol releases some degree of carbon dioxide, it does not end lead to global warming. The explanation is that ethanol is made plants such as corn. Since plants naturally absorb carbon dioxide which is in the atmosphere and for producing ethanol more plants are needed to grow, so the growing plants remove the produced carbon dioxide.
Second, the author argues that using ethanol would reduce the amount of plants which are main sources of food of some animals. In contrast, the lecturer dismisses this issue due to the fact that this process is not going to reduce the sources of food for animals. The part of the plants which is used for producing ethanol is a kind of component of plants which is not eatable. Since the parts which are animals' food are not used, the food still would be available.
Finally, the reading passage asserts that the price of ethanol is very high. Conversely, the speaker highlights the fact that although this claim is true and producing ethanol is supported by the government at the moment, it will not be the same in the future. People will buy more ethanol in the future, so producers will produce more ethanol. As a result, the price will go down. With a drop in price, even more ethanol will be available. Moreover, statistics reveal that by three percent rise in production of ethanol, the price will go down by forty percent.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, however, moreover, second, so, still, in contrast, kind of, such as, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 308.0 270.72406181 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85064935065 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34595390982 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493506493506 0.540411800872 91% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4362624237 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.46844237521 0.272083759551 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170542799152 0.0996497079465 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726247077046 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264851833442 0.162205337803 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604961497205 0.0443174109184 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.