Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The government should spend more money on improving access to the internet than on public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is no doubt that nowadays, transportation plays the key role in people's lives. No one can deny the effect of transportation on our daily lives. Some people may hold this viewpoint and believe that government should most of their money allocate to the public transportation. However, some others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that government should most of their money allocate to improving access to the internet. From my own perspective, the first belief is true. In what follows, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons and examples.
One of the reasons coming to mind at first is that people nowadays are more involved to the public transportation. In other words, people every day go to the office, coffee shop, restaurant, and so on. Hence, public transportation has a crucial impact on their lives. On the other hand, the government should allocate more money to the public transportation in order to people can have a better trip wherever they want to go. An empirical study in the United Stated shows that near a 72 percent of people in the USA everyday uses public transportation to achieve to their destination. This clarifies the fact that people of USA tend to more use public transportation and lessens their time on the traffic jams.
Another equally important reason is that although public transportation plays an important role in our daily lives, the government must allocate more money to it. Because public transportation decrease the air pollution and people can have a parallel role in the government too. In fact, with the expansion of public transportation, people can expect that air pollution deteriorates. In other words, the government must prepare a program to decrease air pollution and increase the level of healthy in their community. Public transportation should train to our children who learn knowledge. It means that government must more budget to the college in order to children to learn using public transportation instead of a car.
To wrap it up, I believe that government with preparing a suitable program in the college and convincing people to use public transportation, it can increase using of it so that people more and more use them. As a result, it is obvious that government should spend more money on the public transportation than on improving access to the internet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 516, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... near a 72 percent of people in the USA everyday uses public transportation to achieve t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 677, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to use'.
Suggestion: to use
...e college in order to children to learn using public transportation instead of a car....
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, may, so, in fact, no doubt, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 8.0752688172 347% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06976744186 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03045147346 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.423772609819 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.0 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9980937046 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.35 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260414524871 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946313340093 0.076458572812 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0908888928734 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204040186607 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951668160106 0.0645574589148 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.