Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The government should spend more money on improving access to the Internet than on public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is critically important for a government to spend funds wisely, for the betterment of a country. In my opinion, I think the government should spend more money on enhancing access to the internet rather than public transportation. In the following essay I intend to put forth my arguments to support my view.
To begin with, as the development in technology people are now more dependent on the internet. The world is globalized after the invention of web services and now the internet is one of a major necessity for people. Everything is now connected with web services like communication among people, students education, office work, and even health care centers depend on the internet. To exemplify, recently when the pandemic hit the world, people daily activities were not affected even though offices, schools and airports had shut down. The people were able to continue with education, and office work because of the internet. To be more specific, it was last semester of my graduation when the covid-19 worse the condition and people had to stay at home. However, our university started online classes and I were able to complete my graduation in time. Thus, this example elucidates that improving the access to the internet is more significant.
In addition, nowadays people mostly rely on their personal vehicle over public transportation. In this modern world cars are easy to afford for people and their prices are very low. Previously, having personal car was a luxury for people therefore ,public mostly relied on the public transport. At that time the transportation system was well-developed and that has improved every year.Now, people need more improvement on the internet because it is the future of the world. For instance, modern vehicle are now safely design that must need internet to track it down. This feature allows vehicle safety which depend on internet services. Therefore, if the area has poor internet services the car may suffer from damages. Hence, this example illustrate that now is the time that the government should spend more money to revamp the access to the internet.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that the internet is more important than public transport so, the government should spend more money on it. This is because, human activities from all around the world rely on the internet , and because it is the future of the world so people need enhance internet.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 395, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs depend on the internet. To exemplify, recently when the pandemic hit the world...
^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...al car was a luxury for people therefore ,public mostly relied on the public trans...
^^
Line 5, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...transportation system was well-developed and that has improved every year.Now, p...
^^
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Now
...loped and that has improved every year.Now, people need more improvement on the i...
^^^
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d and that has improved every year.Now, people need more improvement on the inte...
^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ll around the world rely on the internet , and because it is the future of the wor...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2023.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08291457286 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74814058623 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48743718593 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9944768688 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9523809524 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2380952381 5.45110844103 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264667617773 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910413027978 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986636676128 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188666498454 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481234447081 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.