Both reading and listening are talking about genetic modification. In the reading, the author talks about the benefits of genetic modification tree which it is possible to create trees that produce more fruitm grow faster, or resistent negative conditions. On the other hand, the lecture refute the benefits of genetic modification tree through presenting their evidence.
First of all, the reading passage claims that the genetically modified tree are created to be harder than nature trees and in this way trees can more survive with genetic modification. Conversely, the lecture brings up the ideas that genetic modification tree resistent condition is not sure to survive. Moreover, genetic diversification conduct in climate which less some tree nature and in this enviroment can survive but genetic modification is much more unifrom and it is environmentally challengable and eventually genetic modified tree wipe out.
Second of all, the reading passage illustrates this fact that genetically modified trees ensure it can have number of benefit in the economic. In contrast, the professor explains the fact that the genetic modification trees hidden the cost and companies farmer much more loose their money. In addition, farmer collect seeds must more pay money in order to grow thier plant.
Finally, the reading argues that another benefits of genetic modification trees can prohibit form over making use of wild trees. While, the lecture reveal this fact that genetically modified trees can create more damage for wild trees and it aggressively grows more plant. Therefore, genetic modified trees cannot compete with other resource such as soil natural, water, and so on. It eventually cut out trees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...the cost and companies farmer much more loose their money. In addition, farmer collec...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, in addition, in contrast, such as, talking about, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 267.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43820224719 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76150629945 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516853932584 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2424973679 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.692307692 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1538461538 7.06452816374 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.529598946952 0.272083759551 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217756809939 0.0996497079465 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110778137785 0.0662205650399 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.359407861781 0.162205337803 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777244528957 0.0443174109184 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.