Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
There is no doubt that nowadays jobs play the key role in people's lives. No one can deny the effect of jobs in our daily's lives. A controversial question which is most of the time raised regarding this issue how much time is preferable for people who work for a company? Some people may hold this viewpoint and believe that it is more exciting for people to have a job where they work only three days a week for long hours. However, some other may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that it is more enjoyable for people to have a job where they work five days a week for shorter hours. I strongly concur that the first belief is true. In what follows, I will pinpoint the most outstanding reasons and examples.
One of the reasons coming to mind at first is that the longtime of job with only three days a week usually can play the key role in people's lives. In fact, one of the aspects of the beneficiary for that people is to have a more time with their families. In other words people who work long time of day, they can spend more time with other members of the families and they want to spend more time with their children to help them in order to their children increase their abilities in different aspects of their lives. Hence, people who make a decision to work long time can assist their families, other people in the community and so on. One of the studies recently conducted from a journal of mental psychology reveals this fact that people who work long time of day have a more free time and have a more releasable mind than people who have a short time of day with working five days a week.
Another equally important reason is that from a psychology standpoint, people who work long time of a day with three days have a more efficiency in their works. In fact, these people have a fresh mind than other to assign new word in their fields of which they work. Moreover, these people can give a new solution for problem which creates in their works. On the other hand, people who don't have a long time for three day cannot more concentrate in their work because of low energy and haven't sufficient energy. One study in the United States shows that already 26 percent of people have a work with three days of week. This clarifies the fact that it can be predictable that the efficiency and productivity on the work can have a negative consequence in the communities.
All in all, it is my deep belief is that working three days a week for long hours have a more advantage for employee than people who work five days a week for shorter time. In addition, most people in this way can increase their abilities than other people don't have three days a week. Therefore, it is more enjoyable to people to have a job where they work only three days a week for long hours.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ir works. On the other hand, people who dont have a long time for three day cannot m...
^^^^
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...in their work because of low energy and havent sufficient energy. One study in the Uni...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 258, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...rease their abilities than other people dont have three days a week. Therefore, it i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, in addition, in fact, no doubt, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 26.0 11.0286738351 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2268.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 518.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.37837837838 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24458522184 2.67179642975 84% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.353281853282 0.524837075471 67% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 708.3 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4112583388 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383644158797 0.236089414692 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167336254534 0.076458572812 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139591235666 0.0737576698707 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325370615763 0.150856017488 216% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0979041683548 0.0645574589148 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.42 10.9000537634 77% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes. We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.