TPO 23
Both the article and lecturer discuss the factors which are involved in the decline of yellow cedar. The essay provides three factors to explain the reduction. However, the professor refutes all of the reasons which will be amplified hereunder.
Firstly, the professor avers that the cedar bark beetle cannot be a major factor due to these trees get resistant to them over time. So, these insects can affect them. They can only attack the died cedar which in this situation, these insects are not the central factor for their death. Conversely, the text contends that the beetle larvae eat the wood of these trees. As a result, this insect is a good candidate for the cause of the tree's decline.
Secondly, the lecturer declares that the brown bears have not any key role in this declination. The yellow cedars are living in both the mainlands and islands of North America. Although these bears would not live in the islands, we see the number of trees has been gown down in the islands. As a result, the bears are not responsible. On the other hand, the article remarks due to the high sugar content of these trees bears sometimes claw at the cedars to eat the tree bark. therefore, they may be effective in this process.
Finally, the professor states if climate change kills the cedars, in high elevations more trees should have died. While we would not see this happening. In contrast, the text says the patterns of seasonal, as well as the day-to-day temperatures, have changed in northwestern North America. So, it may affect the sensitive roots of cedars and leads to undermining the health of the whole tree.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...duction. However, the professor refutes all of the reasons which will be amplified hereund...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 477, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...law at the cedars to eat the tree bark. therefore, they may be effective in this process....
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 115, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...elevations more trees should have died. While we would not see this happening. In con...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, in contrast, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1373.03311258 98% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82857142857 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42048021884 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546428571429 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.939338184 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.1111111111 110.228320801 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5555555556 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.493300949137 0.272083759551 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130616595793 0.0996497079465 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766610602376 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265049267688 0.162205337803 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0979547657866 0.0443174109184 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.3589403974 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 53.8541721854 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.0289183223 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.