TPO 23 integrated writing
The reading discusses that the population of yellow cedar trees gradually decreased. The author listed three factors to support this issue. However, the lecture finds all the reasons inadequate and presents some evidence to refute all these hypotheses.
First, the reading passage finds out that insect parasites are responsible since they eat the bark of trees, indeed, the beetle larva feed on wood. In contrast, the speaker states that healthy trees are more much resistant to the beetle as their bark surface saturated with poisonous chemical material. As a matter of fact, the beetle attack on the damaged or sick trees. As a result, the author dismisses this viewpoint.
Furthermore, the author proposes that bears claw at the cedar trees to eat the sweet barks which contain lots of sugar and by this work, they weaken the cedar trees. On the contrary, the speaker casts doubt on this issue and asserts that beers claw at some trees. Also, there are no bears on the Island, hence, they cannot be a possible reason.
Last but not least, the author mentioned that the climate has been changed gradually, and these affected root systems of the cedar trees. On the other hand, the lecturer illustrated that dying trees in lower elevation in a warm place and despite the trees die in high elevation in cold weather so sensitive roots do not seem to be a potential claim. Therefore, the speaker rebuts this idea as well as other hypotheses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the author dismisses this viewpoint. Furthermore, the author proposes that be...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, so, therefore, well, in contrast, as a matter of fact, as a result, as well as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1212.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 245.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94693877551 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37768327564 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587755102041 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.5497870502 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2307692308 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8461538462 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3846153846 7.06452816374 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336334899888 0.272083759551 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10628996459 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750707782645 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185354338677 0.162205337803 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433305317574 0.0443174109184 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.