TPO 26 integrated writing
The reading discusses that zebra mussels are strongly a serious threat to fish populations. The author listed three factors to support this idea. However, the speaker casts doubt on this issue and presents some evidence to refute all three factors.
First, the author argues that history is shown that they are unstoppable invasions. Because they stuck to the ship and spread all the ocean. In contrast, the speaker rejects this claim and asserts that they were manageable but the people did not have sufficient knowledge of how to control them. For example, they could kill them by empty this water from the ship, in spite of surviving in the water, they will die in a dry place.
Second, the author asserts that they were hardy species that can dominate in a new habitat as they did not have any predators. On the contrary, the speaker dismisses this idea and declares that in the beginning, birds did not have any food resources they eat the zebra mussel, and because of that they became dominant.
Last but not least, the author indicates that they fed on planktons so they caused the population of fish to diminish. On the other hand, the speaker states that although the overall population of fish decreased and they had the negative impacts on them and plants, they generated nutrition material that fish could absorb them. Therefore, the speaker rebuts this claim too by providing this reason.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so, therefore, for example, in contrast, in spite of, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1169.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 239.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89121338912 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32853364618 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55230125523 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0788559441 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4166666667 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267790824035 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102545675311 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698908501334 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161468880312 0.162205337803 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440713570637 0.0443174109184 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.