TPO 24
The reading passage and the lecture are both discuss about the discovered materials in the remains of animals fossils. With this in mind, the author resoned that these materials are probably the remain of blood vessels and collagen. The lecture, on the other hand, contradicts all three episodes of arguments mentioned in the passage, believing that these reasons are skeptical.
First, both the text and listening material argues that idea of soft substance in the hollows in the bones of the fossils. In this vein, the reading points out that the finded substance are likely to be the remains of blood vessels. Conversely, the professor argues that those soft material are more likely to be the remains of bacteria that colonized on vessels hollows.
Secondly, both the reading and lecture discuss the result of microscopic examination which reveals the existence of blood cells' remains. While the text material assests that spheres examination shows the trace of iron-material in the sphere, the professor refutes this claim. In this case, the lecturer makes it clear that some primitive animals didn't have blood, so it is might be the remains of irish minerals
Finally, both the reading and the listening argues the idea of observing collagen remains on the bone tissue of dinosaur. In this thought of line, the author holds the view that the collagen associate with bone tissues, therefore the discovery of this biochemical substance in the bone test could show observing collagen is related to dinasor's bone tissue. However, the lecturer explains that collagen is not long lasting, so the existence of collagen in the dinosaur bone is contradict this fact. Besides, he mentions that the available collagen in the dinasors bone can be from another source for instance from human's skin and through touching the bone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...soned that these materials are probably the remain of blood vessels and collagen. The lect...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'spheres'' or 'sphere's'?
Suggestion: spheres'; sphere's
...s. While the text material assests that spheres examination shows the trace of iron-mat...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...es it clear that some primitive animals didnt have blood, so it is might be the remai...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 477, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'contradicted'.
Suggestion: contradicted
...nce of collagen in the dinosaur bone is contradict this fact. Besides, he mentions that th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, conversely, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15151515152 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52821823606 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484848484848 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9357566112 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 21.698381199 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06452816374 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0782206081851 0.272083759551 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324750697047 0.0996497079465 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0230905061351 0.0662205650399 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0493310043011 0.162205337803 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144983742723 0.0443174109184 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.3589403974 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.