The reading and the lecturer are both about the old fossils of Tyrannosaurus rex, a Dinosaur. The article is about the remains of Tyrannosaurus rex leg bones and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor casts doubt on the reading and refutes each of the author's points.
First, the article claims that by breaking the legs of T.rex they found the soft and flexible organic substance in the blood vessels of t.rex. Nevertheless, the professor refutes this point by saying that when the animal dies they convert into organic material in the blood which might be like soft and moist.
Second, the article explains that microscopic analysis has shown the existence of spheres which could be the remains of red blood cells. On the other hand, the professor refutes and says that the preemptive animals do not have the red blood cells and spheres might differ in their origin.
Third, the text posits that the dinosaur consists of collagen. However, the professor says that the collagen is disappeared in animals from the past 1200 years ago. Furthermore, the animal does not have T.rex. He says that it might be the human skin of the researcher who is handling the bones.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 1373.03311258 72% => OK
No of words: 201.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94029850746 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44454344989 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557213930348 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 419.366225166 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4002088814 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2727272727 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347923133588 0.272083759551 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121552047319 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684626569036 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192989529218 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502058109108 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.