The reading and the lecture are both about the Buzzers. The article states that buzzers who praise a product just like a normal conversation has lead to controversy and provides three reasons to support. However, the lecturer explains that buzzers are not like ordinary advertisements and opposes each of the author's points.
First, the article conveys that customers should know about the buzzer because buzzers are paid for advertising the product. They usually mislead the customers. However, the lecture refutes this point by saying that buzzers are not like ordinary advertisers. The company truths the person and hire this person to use the product and to give trustworthy reviews.
Second, the text explains that buzzers pretend to be just like normal persons and gives false information to increase their sales. Furthermore, this may harm the customers. Nevertheless, the lecture opposes this point by saying that customers usually ask a lot of questions about the product like the price, service and how long buzzer is using the product. So there is no point in pretending about the product.
Finally, the reading posits that because of buzzers, people may not truth each other. Which seriously affects their relationships. On the other hand, the lecture argues that if the person is bad, companies will not hire the person. He gave an example, of a mobile phone which he used and says he really love the product and experienced and gave a trustful review to the people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...zzers, people may not truth each other. Which seriously affects their relationships. ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'loves'.
Suggestion: loves
... phone which he used and says he really love the product and experienced and gave a ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, really, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12757201646 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58319545892 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534979423868 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4999872286 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0666666667 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286140919628 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952763859384 0.0996497079465 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478260789471 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17606530642 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627323287262 0.0443174109184 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.