In term of whether the vessles were actually used as ancient electric batteries. The reading and lecture both contradictory to each other.
First, the reading states that these vessels were not attached to any conductors. Also they did not found any wire. So these vessels were not used as batteries. On the other hand, the professor refutes this notion by saying that these vessels had been discovered by not archelogists people but, they were local people. So they might be found wire and other suff but, thery throwgh it away because they did not know that these materials are important. Furthermore, they were not interested in these materials.
Second, contrary to the belief in the reading passage that the copper cylinders in the jasrs were matched to copper cylinders at the Seleucia that were used for holding scrolls. So, these might be had the same use. Nevertheless, the professor pointing out that these vessels may be had the same original but, they recognized later that these vessels with vessels and liquid generate electricity. In addition, cylinder copper maybe in the begining used for one purpose and after that adapted to other purposes.
Finally, the article avers that there were not any evidence that the ancient people used these vessels to produce electricity. However, the professor questions this idea by explaining that these vessels may be used to produce sensation. As a result, the might be used these vessels to convience the other people that they have power. Furthermore, in the medical field they used to use these electricty to relief pain or for healing. This is contradicted what is the passage indicated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ls were not attached to any conductors. Also they did not found any wire. So these v...
^^^^
Line 7, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oses. Finally, the article avers that there were not any evidence that the anc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, may, nevertheless, second, so, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08455882353 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55998272847 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488970588235 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8934375751 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3529411765 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.82352941176 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382222540074 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144596735077 0.0996497079465 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789396837772 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250538024527 0.162205337803 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561989407313 0.0443174109184 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.