The reading and lecture both discuss the idea of colonization the asteroids. While the reading provides three benefits of asteroids colonization, the professor refutes, saying none of these claims are convincing.
Firstly, the reading states that it is very easy to land and send the tools to the asteroids because of the low gravity over there. On the other hand, the professor argues this notion by saying that it is easy to land over there due to the low gravity, but the low gravity cannot prevent the risk. For example, low gravity can cause loss of body mass. So, people who will live there they will suffer from health problems such as, lose of body mass and denesity.
In addition, the article avers that we can benefit from the raw materials like gold that we can find it at the asteroids surface. However, the professor rejects this idea by pointing out the profitability idea is not the whole picture. This is because the cost of supporting and getting these materials will decrease the profit. For instance, the large quantities of gold materials in the market will decrease the price. As a result, the profitability of selling these materials will decrease.
Lastly, the reading shows that it is very easy ti reach these asteroids because most of them are very close to the earth planet. Nevertheless, the professor question this idea by explaining that even it is not hard to get these planets, it will be very tough to get back to the earth. In fact, these asteroids are very close to the earth, but they cannot stay like this. In addition, many of these asteroids are going far from the earth. So, we cannot get back easily from them. In fact, out return trip will be challenge.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, lastly, nevertheless, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1407.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 297.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73737373737 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43897041307 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484848484848 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8416606368 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.7647058824 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4705882353 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0564814124861 0.272083759551 21% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0219603915813 0.0996497079465 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0209748950964 0.0662205650399 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0315794314509 0.162205337803 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185715935596 0.0443174109184 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 8.42419426049 83% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.