According to the given set of the reading passage, it is the author's conviction that the vessels, which have been found in Iraq, have not been used as electrical batteries owing to several highlighted reasons. However, the lecturer casts doubt on this justification and refutes each of the author's specific point by some counter-arguments that are as follows:
First of all, the author holds the view that there is not the existence of wires or conductors in the area, as a result, the vessels could not be utilized as batteries. On the contrary, the lecture finds this reason unconvincing by asserting that the vessels were found by local people, not archaeologists, so it is possible that other conductors and wires were neglected by these people.
Secondly, even though the reading passage posits that the vessels have been used in order to preserve scrolls, the lecturer agrees with this claim but he adds that it is possible after a while some inventors have added iron rods to produce a battery. Hence, the born of batteries might have been related to ancient people.
As the last point to emphasize the reading claim, the author says that the vessels have been thoroughly useless. Yet again, the lecturer states on the opposite side and contradicts that there is evidence that ancient people used them as a magical power due to its invisibility. Furthermore, doctors have used these vessels in healing to reduce the pain of human muscles by stimulating them. All in all, the points made by the author in the passage seems to be implausible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...n set of the reading passage, it is the authors conviction that the vessels, which have...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 474, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in the passage seems to be implausible.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, as a result, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95038167939 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7212883941 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538167938931 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.0 49.2860985944 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.111111111 110.228320801 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1111111111 21.698381199 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8888888889 7.06452816374 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298319897479 0.272083759551 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119321413397 0.0996497079465 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441029312157 0.0662205650399 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176638960495 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0153050337808 0.0443174109184 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.7273730684 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.