According to the given set of the reading passage, it is the author's conviction that the zebra mussel, which is a freshwater originated from Eastern Europe, has been dispersed in some parts of the North America and have had significant problems, will never be stopped owing to several highlighted reasons. However, the lecturer cast doubts on this claim and refutes the justification by saying that the human's knowledge was not sufficient in the past in order to control this phenomenon.
First of all, the author holds the view that the ships are responsible for distribution of the zebra mussels by transporting them in their bottoms or in the ballast water. On the contrary, the lecturer finds this reason doubtful by saying that it is true that zebra mussels have gone by these ships, but while refilling the water of ships in the North America, the salty water kill a huge number of zebra mussels and thus these species will not be able to colonize in the region.
Secondly, although, the author posits that the zebra mussels are not encountered to predators and as a result, they will dominant as soon as possible, the professor refutes this point too and says that a kind of birds is the predators of the zebra mussels in the Europe. So these birds will explore them and eventually will find them to feed.
As the last point to emphasize the reading claim, the author asserts that there will be an enormous decline in the number of fishes due to the existence of competition. Yet again, the lecturer states on the opposite side and contradicts that it is obvious that it will have a negative influence on fishes but on the other hand it causes a positive effect on some specific species. Since the zebra mussels will release nutrient in the bottom of the lake, some fishes will forage them and will survive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...n set of the reading passage, it is the authors conviction that the zebra mussel, which...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 404, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...es the justification by saying that the humans knowledge was not sufficient in the pas...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, kind of, as a result, first of all, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76025236593 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50453717588 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507886435331 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 21.2450331126 165% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.6826070385 49.2860985944 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.666666667 110.228320801 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.2222222222 21.698381199 162% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.7777777778 7.06452816374 223% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37217230647 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14931219544 0.0996497079465 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108507170846 0.0662205650399 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228627423685 0.162205337803 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808827579089 0.0443174109184 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.3589403974 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 53.8541721854 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.0289183223 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 10.7273730684 177% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.498013245 152% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.2008830022 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.