TPO 27 integrated writing
The reading discusses the reasons that caused the Little Ice Age to form, hence, listed three factors to support this idea. However, the speaker finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them.
First, the author mentioned that the Gulf Stream is one of the possible reasons. In the past in one period the weather got warm and it caused glaciers to be melted. In contrast, the speaker rebuts this reason and asserts that scientists knew that disrupting cooling happened only in Europe and North America, while it occurred in the southern hemisphere.
Second, the reading passage points out that the volcanic eruption produces a lot of dark clouds and they blocked the sunlight. On the other hand, the speaker casts doubt on this issue and states that it is true that volcanic eruption put enough gases in the atmosphere, but it largely strikes usually affect some events like colorful sunlight, rainfall, and others. Therefore, the story of realizing the gas not support the decline of the weather temperature.
Last but not least, the author argues that the human population is responsible for this event because when their population decreased, they no longer cut the trees for cultivating, consequently producing the greenhouse gases dropped. On the contrary, the speaker rejects this idea and describes the removing CO2 and HSO4 can not play this role in the atmosphere, though it helped it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, however, second, so, therefore, while, in contrast, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08547008547 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49485188398 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619658119658 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1633623924 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1 7.06452816374 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228126996212 0.272083759551 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762862501655 0.0996497079465 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506379659465 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119885262264 0.162205337803 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186820401754 0.0443174109184 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.