TPO 20 integrated writing
The reading discusses that the "let it burn" policy caused a vast forest burnt and damage. The author listed three factors to illustrate the damage of Yellowstone fires. However, the lecture finds all the reasons dubious and presents sone evidence to refute all of them.
First, the author proposes that that fire caused extensive damage to the park's tree and other vegetation. On the contrary, the speaker casts doubt on this issue and asserts that vegetation became more diverse after the fire. Owing to the fact that some vegetation could not grow before it as some other vegetations were dominant in that area like Eer. Besides, others appear again after the high-level heat they were exposed to.
Furthermore, the author describes that it harms wildlife like elk and deer, due to the damages to their habitat and food chain. On the other hand, the speaker states that it provides a new opportunity for other animals such as rabbits to have a strong food chain and extend their population. As a result, the speaker rejects this idea.
Last but not least, the reading passage illustrated that it had a negative impact on the local economy as the number of tourists decreased. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this idea by standing that it does not happen every year, thus after the population and vegetation cover get backed to the prior, tourists come back each year after that like before. Therefore, all the reasons are rebutted by the speaker one after another.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, in contrast, such as, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99598393574 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40395581583 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598393574297 0.540411800872 111% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8564412453 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6923076923 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06452816374 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206107483012 0.272083759551 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0674201294469 0.0996497079465 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611043061091 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107811838104 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464653518471 0.0443174109184 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.