TPO 46 integrated writing
The reading discusses that recording medical data in electronic form has some advantages. The author listed three factors to support this idea. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas uncertain and presents some evidence to refute those reasons.
First, the author mentioned that it helps reduce the cost, as it is not necessary to use papers. Besides, they occupy no space and access to them is easy from anywhere. In contrast, the speaker disclaims this idea and asserts that doctors do not throw out the papers, in other words, they keep the recording as they needed and legal policy.
Furthermore, the author points out that electronic database prevents errors and mistakes that are related to the handwriting or improper transcription of data. On the other hand, the speaker casts doubt on this issue. She explains that doctors take notes and write prescriptions by hand. Hence the problem of poor handwriting will not be ceased with this approach.
Last but not least, the passage reading proposes that it will come to aid in researching. Because they can use the data that gathered in an enormous amount and also accessibility to them is easy. On the contrary, the lecture describes the opposite view of this claim. Electronic data followed the same rules of paper data so privacy does not let other persons use them freely for the study and such patients restrict using their medical records for other utility except their treatment. As a result, the lecture rejects all those reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 289, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... notes and write prescriptions by hand. Hence the problem of poor handwriting will no...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 540, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the lecture rejects all those reasons.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, so, in contrast, as a result, in other words, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1262.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06827309237 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50541260174 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 145.348785872 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614457831325 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.4641319251 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.1333333333 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 7.06452816374 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286546711045 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745183106664 0.0996497079465 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933249643441 0.0662205650399 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152716950809 0.162205337803 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04157681983 0.0443174109184 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.