tpo 25, integrated writing
The reading depicts that the vessels, which gained in Iraq, were used as old electric batteries, and it claims it could not be used as the battery in ancient times. The author provides some reasons for supporting this hypothesis. However, the speaker finds all the reasons dubious and presents some evidence to refute all three factors.
First, the reading argues that as it does not attach to any metal so it could not be an electrical battery. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this view by standing that it is not an archeological object and does not recognize the metal.
Second, the reading passage points out that its copper cylinder is similar to the one that was found on the ruins of Seleucia which contains the scrolls of sacred texts. To provide more reason, the author mentioned it has the same shape too. On the contrary, the lecturer casts doubt on this issue and states that perhaps their origin was the same and they used for scrolls, but it can bear as the battery too, in other words, it adopts for another purpose.
Last but not least the reading proposes that there is no evidence to support that any devices were to reply to electricity. On the other hand, the speaker rebuts this reason and make a reason to support his idea. The speaker illustrated that it may be used for healing, in the past, the doctors used it to stimulate the muscles and to cure some pains.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, second, so, in contrast, in other words, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 247.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64372469636 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30902724369 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546558704453 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1033737246 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.272727273 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255863454356 0.272083759551 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901004509741 0.0996497079465 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066913766761 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145365862371 0.162205337803 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0389734669908 0.0443174109184 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.8541721854 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.