TPO 28 integrated writing
The reading argues that Peary reached the North Pole and also listed three reasons to support this idea. However, the speaker finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute not solid evidence.
First, the author proposes that the National Geographic Society sent a committee to search for this fact and they proved the accuracy of this claim. In contrast, the speaker rejects this reason and assets that this organization provides financial aid for him and also, they were close friends. Hence, their results are not trustworthy.
Second, the reading passage indicates that because the British explorer reached in less 37 days and has similar dogsled like Peary this claim is true. On the other hand, the speaker casts doubt on this issue by standing that superficially it seems true, both have the same sled, but Avery did not transport food, the food was transported by airplane. As a result, they did not have the same speed. Besides, Peary faced unfavorable conditions.
Finally, the author points out that the photograph supports this reason by measuring the shadow in the photo to calculate the position of the sun. On the contrary, the speaker rebuts this idea and declares that the photos faded over time. Therefore, the shadow is blurred and faded and it could not support the acceptable measures to find the position of the sun.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, hence, however, second, so, therefore, in contrast, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1148.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 227.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05726872247 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38175708071 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612334801762 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.6162320596 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6666666667 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9166666667 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06452816374 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305465153702 0.272083759551 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101487157921 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848666495858 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163805030854 0.162205337803 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648744484317 0.0443174109184 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.