TPO 47 integrated writing
The reading discusses that pterosaurs were not able to fly and the author listed three factors to support this hypothesis. However, the lecturer finds all the reasons dubious and presents some evidence to refute all of them.
First, the reading proposes that as modern reptiles are cold-blooded, they were too. Hence, their slow metabolism does not produce a lot of energy for them. In contrast, the lecture asserts that their fossils show they had dense hair covering that helps them to maintain their body temperature like warm-blooded animals to support the supply of energy. As a result, the speaker rebuts this idea.
Furthermore, the reading passage points out that the heavyweight refrains from the flight. On the contrary, the speaker casts doubt on this issue and states that their anatomical features help them fly. Inasmuch as the hollows of their bones cause they are light despite large body frames.
Last but not least, the author debates that they need big and powerful muscles in their back legs to launch themselves into the air so they are not able to run or jump due to the weak bones and muscles. On the other hand, the speaker depicts that their taking off is different from other birds. As a matter of fact, they use four limbs, despite the two legs of the birds, to push off the ground and not just by using their backbones. Therefore, the speaker dismisses this fact like other reasons and brings some reasonable reasons to rejects each claim.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, in contrast, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88446215139 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32627704623 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593625498008 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7657832899 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3076923077 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8461538462 7.06452816374 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282884493641 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901884208676 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671541254739 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151439816098 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321959369757 0.0443174109184 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.