TPO 42 integrated writing
The reading passage argues that as birds cannot distinguish the glass from the air, they strictly harm when they fly. The author listed three solutions tp prevent this issue. However, the Speaker finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute all of them.
First, the author points out that clear glass can be replaced by one-way glass and the people in the place can see out but from outside it acts as a mirror. In contrast, the speaker asserts that birds are not able to recognize the mirror so when the picture of sky and trees reflexed in the glass they wrongly hit it. Hence, he rebuts this solution.
Second, the author mentioned that by using colorful or designated glass which for example have some stripes on it, not only are people able to see the outside through the hole but also it protects the birds. On the other hand, the speaker casts doubt on this issue by standing that birds see the opening as a hole that they can enter the building. Besides, if they want to make a small hole, the in-door is dark.
Last but not least, the author proposes that by using a magnetic field, which birds use for navigation, they can emit the magnetic signals that keep the birds far away from the building. On the contrary, the speaker dismisses this solution and states that birds use the magnetic field for very long distances. For instance, when they navigate from the cold area to the warm area before the winter, the magnetic field helps them to navigate. Though, they use their eyes and the sun brightness for the short trip.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, for example, for instance, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60431654676 5.08290768461 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.10520180604 2.5805825403 82% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543165467626 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.55342163355 84% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6782401398 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4615384615 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3846153846 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.449193056043 0.272083759551 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139620278705 0.0996497079465 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986499325275 0.0662205650399 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254768563389 0.162205337803 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392232202339 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 53.8541721854 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 12.2367328918 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.