Scientist were discussing about the causes of little ice age in the reading and provided three points as the reasons for little ice age. Whereas, lecture casts doubt on the point given by scientists in the reading and clarifies with suitable explanation.
Firstly, reading states that ocean current disruption in the gulf stream could be the cause of the little ice age. This disruption was due to cold fresh water from the melted glaciers. Contrary to this opinion, lecture says that scientists are ambiguous about the regions of gulf stream and little ice age. Disruption gulf stream occurred in Northern America and Europe while little ice age happened in the southern hemisphere places like New Zealand and Southern Africa.
Secondly, scientists mentions volcanic eruption be the cause of little ice age because volcanoes send dark clouds of sand and sulfur which block sunlight and it leads to decrease in the temperature. Whereas, lecture agrees with the explanations about the volcanoes but rejects this reason for the little ice age. It states that large volcanoes striking with visual effects like dramatically sun sets and clouds which had not happened in the little ice age region. This shows that volcanoes were not strong enough to carry sand and sulfur.
Thirdly, paragraph states that decrease in human population can be one of the reason which leads to growth of trees in the agricultural land and consequently decrease in the temperature. Whereas, lecture states that humans came back after some time and trees had been chopped off from the agricultural lands. This shows that trees were no longer enough to cause little ice age.
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'whereas', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.303448275862 0.261695866417 116% => OK
Verbs: 0.127586206897 0.158904122519 80% => OK
Adjectives: 0.124137931034 0.0723426182421 172% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0413793103448 0.0435111971325 95% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00689655172414 0.0277247811725 25% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.148275862069 0.128828473217 115% => OK
Participles: 0.0241379310345 0.0370669169778 65% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.48243210095 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0206896551724 0.0208969081088 99% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0931034482759 0.128158765124 73% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00689655172414 0.0158828679856 43% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0103448275862 0.0114777025283 90% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1646.0 1645.83664459 100% => OK
No of words: 270.0 271.125827815 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0962962963 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.385185185185 0.374372842146 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.255555555556 0.287516216867 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.185185185185 0.187439937562 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.1 0.113142543107 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48243210095 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496296296296 0.539623497131 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 47.4817647224 53.8517498576 88% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.7692307692 21.7502111507 95% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8663447508 49.3711431718 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.615384615 132.220823453 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 21.7502111507 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.923076923077 0.878197800319 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 46.3247863248 50.5018328374 92% => OK
Elegance: 2.70588235294 1.90840788429 142% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.65393514275 0.549887131256 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.125800539953 0.142949733639 88% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0336068097443 0.0787303798458 43% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.597457205665 0.631733273073 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.135753184535 0.139662658121 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.312080341004 0.266732575781 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124700141551 0.103435571967 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.436908057239 0.414875509568 105% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.00698559962313 0.0530846634433 13% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.494011340773 0.40443939384 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310782010528 0.0528353158467 59% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.